It
has been said that our modern society is much more complex than, let
say, one hundred years ago. I recall as a young lad of five years of
age, laying in my small cot in my grandparent’s bedroom, and waking
to the sound of horse’s hooves against the paved road outside the
house. This was the local milkman delivering the morning’s milk to
the homes in our small suburb of Surrey Hills.
The
clanging crystal as he placed the bottles in the various boxes, the
sound of hooves’ against the road and the voice in the dark
whispering in a loud cadence:
“Common
boy, we’re almost done… just a few more houses and it’s back
home.”
Perhaps
revealing too much, this was a touch more than forty five years ago.
The one aspect of my memory of that time was the quietness; there
were no freeways and there was only the occasional sound of the ‘red
rattlers’, the passenger trains’ travelling to the city. Forty
five years later, the noise pollution is relentlessly constant, the
sound of rumbling traffic along the roads and freeways; planes,
police helicopters and passenger jets flying overhead has become the
norm in our day to day lives, and we put up with it, we’ve
seemingly ‘adapted’.
This
may be a sentimental illusion, a fantasy of the aged, but there
appears to be more chaos and people around than ever before.
One’s
line of work, of course, has much to do with the amount of contact
you have with people. As a high school teacher, for example, my
contact with people is part of the profession, dealing with young
adults in the hundreds on a daily bases is part of the job.
Interaction with fellow staff members also constitutes a large part
of the day and learning to ‘get along’ is a necessary ingredient
in order for production and harmony to sustain at an acceptable level
for all concerned.
Dealings
with people covers all aspects of life from the grocery clerk to the
bank teller, the electrician to the landlord to the mother-in-law and
particularly one’s spouse. We are required to all get along and we
have set up tacit rules in society to ensure we can live together in
relative harmony. However, when one meets someone who does not follow
these tacit rules or seems to simply not care, thinking only of
themselves, how do we respond?
I
remember a particular person who could not and would not ever listen
but would only contribute to a group conversation about himself. One
afternoon after the students had all left the school and hopefully
gone home, a few of us remained and began talking about the day. If
you are not a teacher, this habit of talking about our day to our
fellow teachers is part of our tacit job description, however, no
Graduate Diploma of Education or an MA in Education can or will teach
you this aspect – it is a necessary part of the job and has been
for many, many years.
We
began talking about a student with troubles at home and at school –
we were all concerned.
Out
of the blue, he walked into the room, hearing the subject of
conversation and began telling us how to deal with this poor young
lady. (Later I discovered he did not teach her). Seamlessly, he
turned the topic of conversation towards his personal life, why he
thought buying a mammoth four-wheel drive was justified and how
stressed he had become about his next holiday in Greece. As
professionals, we listened and nodded our heads, smiled and tried to
look concerned about the petrol guzzling tank he was about to
purchase. He whisked out of the room happy, it seemed, because all
our attention had been on him and his life.
This
behaviour leaked into his teaching, but somehow, some students went
with his flow and managed to achieve the outcomes intended.
I
guess it all came to a climax one day when, as his boss, I intervened
on his Home Group to sort out a Year 7 cat fight. (Year 7 girls can
be a handful)
Once
he caught wind of this, he yelled and screamed at one of the SSO
staff (Teachers Aids) while I had been in the room and stormed off,
slamming the door to the teachers lounge. (In front of two Year 12
students).
Rather
than talking with me about the problem with the children, he took my
intervention as a personal attack on his “turf” or “self” and
decided I was incompetent.
How
do you deal with a person of such narcissist tendencies?
Well
it only got worse as he attempted to turn the staff against me and
visit the managers, telling little tales of my so-called failures.
What he did not know was that the bosses were and are aware of this
individual and did not believe a word he uttered, particularly about
me.
Although
stressed about this person, my main concern has always been the
children.
It
is hard enough working with under-privileged kids and lost souls, but
to also deal with a self-absorbed fellow worker who, in fact, is
trying to destroy you, only adds to the stress.
My
response:
It
was the Roman emperor, Marcus Aurelius, probably the most famous of
Stoic philosophers, who wrote the following practical advice:
"Begin
each day by saying to yourself, "Today I shall meet people who
are interfering, ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, and
selfish." They are made this way because of their ignorance of
what is good and evil...but I, who have seen the nature of good and
beauty, and of evil and its ugliness, know that the inner nature of
the man who does evil is the same as mine, therefore I can't be
harmed by any of these men, for no one can impose on me what is
degrading."
In
other terms, expect the worst in people, and you'll never be
disappointed, and their actions will not affect you, because their
nature is the same as your own.
Enough
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment